Business as usual?
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
posted by CharlesPeirce @ 10:15 PM
2 comments
Pragmaticism
Cut back to Shamrock: "Tito Ortiz is going to find out who Ken Shamrock is, was, and is now." The "is now" in that sentence wasn't really a redundancy. Shamrock was employing a new tense—the ultimate tense—to describe how he was about to be bringing it, how it was about to have been brung.
Sunday, August 13, 2006
Previous Posts
- I think the cappuccino I just bought was a victory...
- Liberalism is alive and well!
- Rove vs. truth, fairness, justice
- Who decides what's science?
- Second-Rate Dictators Club!
- Webb v. Allen
- Public and private
- More X's and Y's: CEO pay
- Rich Lowry can do better than this
- Physics makes me strong
2 Comments:
I don't think that should be happening. I think it's good that we've got experts from different fields using that expertise in our government, but I don't think they should be allowed to maintain business relationships, let alone employment, with any company that might directly benefit from the choices made by their civil office.
I can't say anything reeks of illegality, but the whole situation doesn't seem like it's quite on the up-and-up. I really don't think legal action is warranted, but it would be nice if the partnership would be dissolved of it's own accord now that there is some pressure..
Post a Comment
<< Home