Drilling in Alaska
Question for everyone out there: I want to know whether you think, as Senator Ted Stevens does, that drilling in Alaska in the ANWR is vital to national security. I don't want to know whether you think it's a good idea; I don't want to know whether you think it will bring jobs to Alaska; all I want to know is whether or not it's vital to national security and fighting the so-called war on terror.
Go.
posted by CharlesPeirce @ 4:55 PM
3 comments
3 Comments:
I haven't read his reasoning yet, but I can't see how its vital. We seem to be doing alright thus far. And I think its far more vital to put the money into nuclear fusion research -- which has shown promise lately and may not be too far away from viable solutions, especially if they got a coulpe billion extra dollars. Fusion is a long-term solution that will change the face of the world. Alaska is a short term solution that gives us some small benefit and may destroy some endangered wildlife. Which would be bad.
yeah, it's not vital. That's retarded.
I think this post might be a wee bit expired, but this Senator Stevens personage appears to have been hitting the egg nog a bit early this year.
Hope you are well! We need to hang out sometime soon. Happy New Year, Charley!
Post a Comment
<< Home