Establishment of religion, or helpful pluralism?
posted by CharlesPeirce @ 9:50 AM
3 comments
Pragmaticism
Cut back to Shamrock: "Tito Ortiz is going to find out who Ken Shamrock is, was, and is now." The "is now" in that sentence wasn't really a redundancy. Shamrock was employing a new tense—the ultimate tense—to describe how he was about to be bringing it, how it was about to have been brung.
Friday, August 31, 2007
Previous Posts
- Modern science is amazing.
- Tax and die.
- Richard Rorty
- Brownback vs. Coyne
- Blogversating with j. morgan.
- Sarcasm, or something else?
- I guess we haven't learned anything.
- More hard-hitting analysis from Time
- This opportunity comes once in a lifetime you bett...
- Term limits for Supreme Court Justices?
3 Comments:
How about, detrimental pandering to a class of "repressed" individuals?
Nothing good could possibly come of this.
Charles - aren't 'helpful' and 'pluralism' antithetical? Forget establishment of religion, why are we pandering to a foreign faith in a Western country? What is wrong with this nation?
Remember when Charles used to have opinions on things? Now he just posts links and refuses to take a stand!
Post a Comment
<< Home